Is 'random' anything like 'magic'?
Somebody please help me understand... 'random'.I looked it up at Wikipedia...
"The word random is used to express lack of purpose, cause, order, or predictability in non-scientific parlance. A random process is a repeating process whose outcomes follow no describable deterministic pattern, but follow a probability distribution.
The term randomness is often used in statistics to signify well defined statistical properties, such as lack of bias or correlation." 'Random' lacks a cause?
Show me something... ANYTHING.... anything at all in the whole universe that you can absolutely say with confident certainty... "There is NO 'cause' for such & such."
So if I click Wikipedia's
'Random Article' link in the margin... it will somehow generate a page... for which there is no cause or predictability as to the outcome?
Whoa. Dude! Amazing! Presto chango... Page X !!!
How many of you believe that?
[I have a little piece of ground in Florida I'd like to interest you in. Email me.]Might we meet the creator of such a program? Would he agree that there absolutely is no cause nor predictability involved?
A 'random-numbers generator' has a creator. And he knows the cause (and pattern).
There are three possible camps of people who DON'T know the cause or pattern:
- Those who cling to their belief that there absolutely is 'no cause'.
- Those who admit to simply being ignorant of the cause, and don't care to find out.
- And the inquisitive, who see it all as a riddle, and look diligently for the answer.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd300/cd3003dedf603936bd85188153775ac6e5cd421d" alt=""
Oh... and there's one more thing that troubles me...
What does that other thing mean there at the Wikipedia entry...
"Randomness has an important place in science, philosophy and religion." ?
***********************
Author's Notes...
[Much of this sort of thing has driven me to start writing out my own personal 'Science Apologetics' thought-train. That is, document out loud what I believe in this realm, and why. It's been an interesting endeavor -- one I'd advocate. Try writing a cogent apologetic yourself, and let me know what you learn along the way.]
[Subsequent Note: R.C. Sproul has apparently written on this very topic in his little book called "Not A Chance". Click to read the first chapter online. Maybe even watch this video-clip as Sproul interviews Ben Stein. Ht: Tony Kummer, Said At Southern]